Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

Guest reefatoon

Love how they only handed out tiny fines to the arsehole 6 because they would deem it “unfair” on the fans for any stiffer penalty. Yet here we are, practically a year and a half down the line being shafted by these same bastard people. Bunch of utter cunts and corrupt as fuck.

 

 

Edited by reefatoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that the same Keith that said he never wanted to do another one of wraiths show again at the very start of this? Didn't like the publicity?

 

Sorry like but get on the knacker pile will wraith for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking through the PL accounts, it seems they really can’t afford to have any sort of financial judgement go against them.

 

They have about 1.5 million cash in the bank, the rest of what they get in gets passed on to member clubs.

 

You think they are going to be happy to share a 300m penalty between them to stop a takeover?

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

Mint. We’re going to be on GB News. 
 

 

I’ve seen their viewing figures. I refuse to believe hundreds of people have been asking for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a pile of cringe that is probably going to be (the GB News thing, not Chi). 

 

I find it absolutely mind-bending that anyone would think Steve Wraith is credible in an NUFC context. Surely the only reason you'd collaborate with a person like that would be to help deliver aspirations of (very niche and local) online fame? 

 

I have no time for Keith Patterson and admittedly know little of his (long since irrelevant) legal endeavours, and I find his coverage on here quite surreal - particularly given how well-versed and wary we are of Twitter bullshittery - but even if I did happen to believe he had some influence - or even insider knowledge - on this whole fiasco, his association with that muppet would be enough to instantly discredit everything. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

The people who watch GB News probably don't mind a bit of corruption, so not sure they're going to be bothered by PL corruption.

 

There is no such grouping as "the people who watch GB News", no matter how much you let your imagination run wild about it.

 

All there is are people who watch the news, be it Sky News, GB News, or BBC News - in other words people who care about what is going on in the world.

 

Try not to conjure up 'categories' where none exist, it's not worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anything there has been at least things ongoing in the background, although at a snails pace. CAT Case opened on the 22nd April with the Premier League acknowledging this on the 4th May with them requesting an extension on the 11th May to contest the case. St. James Holdings opposed this on the 11th and 13th May which lead to the initial timeline of the 11th June.

 

The Premier League contested the CAT jurisdiction on 11th June with St. James Holdings countering this with evidence on the 28th June to which the Premier League replied to on the 30th June requesting an extension of time. It seems that St. James Holdings sent correspondence outlining it's position on the 30th June and 1st July regarding this extension the judge considered this and has allowed an extension to reply until 12th July.

 

Arbitration has not started so anyone via Twitter who implied it has been has now been proven to be incorrect. It might also imply why the club released a statement on the 1st July given yet another delay. I'm no expert, but I do wonder if the accounts being delayed contribute to some of the commercially sensitive information currently withheld from the Premier League, although this is from 2019/20 so could just be Ashley's accounting practice.

 

It might also indicate, as their current evidence shows, the Premier League have been granted an extension of time to prepare for the arbitration to the 9th June in that case which potentially delayed the start of the case. I haven't checked, but might be interesting to look at when Keith or Liam put information out to see if the timelines match up or if it has been guesswork. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, WarrenBartonCentrePartin said:

Of course he went on gammonvision :lol:

 

 

 

 

Q. How to turn NUFC in to more of a laughing stock?

A. Send utter fuckwit and shitty kegs on a failing populist news channel to spout absolute utter fucking tripe, cos their mouths are open.

 

The absolute fucking pits. The lowest Ive ever seen this club. Embarrassing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, manorpark said:

 

There is no such grouping as "the people who watch GB News", no matter how much you let your imagination run wild about it.

 

All there is are people who watch the news, be it Sky News, GB News, or BBC News - in other words people who care about what is going on in the world.

 

Try not to conjure up 'categories' where none exist, it's not worth it.

 

 

It's quite easy. For example, FOX news. I can group those into a particular bracket straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...